A brief explanation for a long silence

 It is now many weeks since I last posted on this blog. This post seeks briefly to explain some of the issues which have led to that silence.

The volume of material on the Lucy Letby miscarriage of justice is enormous.

Some of the material in the public domain is, so it seems to me, inaccurate or unreliable.

Some of the evidence reportedly given at the trials of Lucy Letby is, in my view, worthless and, in some aspects, seems to me to constitute perjury contrary to Section 1 of the Perjury Act 1911.

In addition I have increasingly come to suspect that there may indeed have been crimes in the Neonatal Unit at the Countess of Chester Hospital with respect to some of the babies on the indictment against Lucy Letby. Those suspected crimes are Gross Negligence Manslaughter. The cases of suspected Gross Negligence Manslaughter are not, in my view, attributable to Lucy Letby. Those I suspect in relation to the suspected Gross Negligence Manslaughter are among the doctors employed at the Countess of Chester Hospital.

My views regarding the so-called "insulin poisonings" has also evolved. Currently I believe that perjury may have played a key part in the convictions of Lucy Letby for the so-called "insulin poisonings". My current view is that there were no "insulin poisonings" and that the so-called "insulin poisonings" of which Lucy Letby was convicted are, in fact, examples of misinterpretation of the "insuling pseudopoisoning triad".

Very serious concerns exist in relation to the actions of Cheshire Constabulary, the Crown Prosecution Service and the barristers who prosecuted Lucy Letby not to mention concerns regarding the conduct of the trials of Lucy Letby and the credibility of the Court of Appeal judgements.

Finally, the Thirlwall witch hunt has thrown up the question of whether the supposed appointment of Lady Justice Thirlwall was, in fact, legally void.

Given the scope and seriousness of my concerns it is a difficult task to put those complex thoughts and facts into a coherent story.

I hope to take steps towards creating that coherent story over the next few weeks.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Hypothesis: The death of Baby A may be attributable to a medical error in the NeoNatal Unit at the Countess of Chester Hospital

 Some weeks ago I described the complexities relating to the prosecution(s) and convictions(s) of Lucy Letby as a "complex matrix of competing hypotheses".  See  A complex spectrum of competing hypotheses  In this post I want briefly to set out my hypothesis regarding the causation of the death of Baby A and the collapse of Baby B. The hyptheses adopted by the prosecution was that Lucy Letby had murdered Baby A and had attempted to murder Baby B. The jury (wrongly in my view) accepted that the prosecution's hypotheses were proven. Lucy Letby was (wrongly) convicted of the (supposed) murder of Baby A and Lucy Letby was also (wrongly) convicted of the (supposed) attempted murder of Baby B. The hypotheses set out by the International Expert Panel were that there had been no murder of attempted murder. My hypothesis is slightly different. It is close to the hypothesis implicitly put forward by the International Expert Panel but specifically includes an element to the eff...
Read more

Rex v Letby: A complex spectrum of competing hypotheses

 When, a few days ago, I began this blog I used the terms "anatomy of a miscarriage of justice" and "anatomy of a witch hunt". It remains my view that Lucy Letby has been the subject of a miscarriage of justice and continues to be the subject of a witch hunt. The volume of written and video material relating to the prosecution of Lucy Letby is enormous. A substantial proportion of it is, in my view, worthless or of little evidential value. It seems to me that to make sense of this mass of material it is appropriate to consider the prosecution of Lucy Letby as a contest among a spectrum of competing hypotheses. At one end of the spectrum is the implicit notion that Lucy Letby not only murdered or sought to murder all the babies to which the indictment referred but may also have killed or sought to kill a substantial number of other babies both at the Countess of Chester Hospital and in Liverpool. At the other end of the spectrum is the notion that all the deaths and ...
Read more

Rex v Letby: Anatomy of a miscarriage of justice. Anatomy of a witch hunt

 The prosecution of Lucy Letby for multiple counts of murder and multiple counts of attempted murder is a cause for huge public concern. This blog will seek to analyse the "evidence" against Lucy Letby in sufficient detail to demonstrate that her conviction for multiple counts of murder and multiple counts of attempted murder is unsafe. In addition I will seek to explore the issues which lead me to conclude that the Thirlwall Inquiry may fairly be termed a "witch hunt". More when I feel that I am in a position to put the evidence together to support my contention that there has been a miscarriage of justice and that the Thirlwall Inquiry is an officially-sanctioned "witch hunt".
Read more